material removal investigation

  • Experimental investigation of spark gap and material ...

    The developed mathematical models for spark gap and material removal rate will provide guidelines to the manufacturing engineers for prediction of spark gap and material removal rate in advance. The maximum material removal rate, i.e., 25.375 mm 3 /min and minimum spark gap, i.e., 0.017 mm indicate that the newly developed Al/ZrO 2(p)-MMC can ...

    [PDF]
  • State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations ...

    investigation and remediation of contaminated sites in order to eliminate and/or control threats to human health and the environment in a timely and cost-effective manner. To ensure cons istency and c ertainty in the pro cess, clean up objectives for soil and groundwater

  • Investigation on the Material Removal and Surface ...

    According to the experimental results, the material removal rate (MRR) and surface generation are investigated. The results show that both ultrasonic lapping and ultrasonic CMP can decrease the two-body abrasion and reduce the peak-to-valley (PV) value of surface roughness, the effect of ultrasonic in lapping can contribute to the higher MRR and better surface quality for the following CMP.

    [PDF]
  • Investigation of "Hot-Spots" as a Function of Material ...

    By measuring the temperature dependence of the surface resistance at low field between 4.2 K and 1.7 K, the variation of niobium material parameters as a function of .

    [PDF]
  • Investigation of Waste Material in the Bliss Corner ...

    assist MassDEP in moving forward with the State-lead investigation. It was determined the waste material/fill layer is shallow and fairly narrow across the study area, ranging from a few inches below the ground surface to approximately 2 feet in depth. Using this information, MassDEP can now focus the investigation on assessing soil located within

    [PDF]
  • Theoretical and experimental investigation of material ...

    Further, uniform removal of material through compensation of the progressive tool wear is achievable. The hardness of compliant SAG tool is 60A and offset is set to be 0.3 mm as practical process parameters. The material removal rate on steel with respect to the grinding time, from 0 to 32 min, was evaluated and shown in Fig. 24(a).